Just FYI, gawk's dfa.c is now in sync w/Gnulib's.
There are still some problems on Vax/VMS. I suspect it's environmental
but will let you know if not.
Thanks!
Arnold
arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Thanks for this. I will work on reducing the differences between
> what's in Gnulib and w
Paul,
Thanks for this. I will work on reducing the differences between
what's in Gnulib and what's in gawk.
Vax/VMS is dead as a commercial system, true. But it remains alive as
a hobbyist system, especially as it's very easy to run in simulation
under SIMH.
Thanks!
Arnold
Paul Eggert wrote:
On 1/29/20 7:34 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
I would say that it's not worth the effort - except for the person(s)
who care a lot about Vax/VMS.
Normally I'd agree, but if Arnold cares about VAX/VMS and if we want
Gnulib dfa.c to match Gawk dfa.c, then in this particular case it makes
some sense t
Hi Arnold,
> The gentleman who maintains the gawk port for VMS reports that he
> can get dfa.c to compile on Vax/VMS, but that he gets failues when
> trying to use it to compile regular expressions.
>
> The Vax/VMS C compiler does not support 64 bit integers at all
> (unlike GCC on 32-bit x86, fo
Hi.
The gentleman who maintains the gawk port for VMS reports that he
can get dfa.c to compile on Vax/VMS, but that he gets failues when
trying to use it to compile regular expressions.
The Vax/VMS C compiler does not support 64 bit integers at all
(unlike GCC on 32-bit x86, for example).
This m
