Jim Meyering wrote:
> I wrote the following a few weeks ago, thinking some day
> I'd write something more involved. I'm not very happy with it,
> because, at least with coreutils, it runs for too long without
> giving any progress indicator.
Incremental diffs would be cool... until then, here's m
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ha! I wrote the following a few weeks ago, thinking some day
I'd write something more involved. I'm not very happy with it
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Ha! I wrote the following a few weeks ago, thinking some day
>>> I'd write something more involved. I'm not very happy with it,
>>> because, at least with coreutils, it
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ha! I wrote the following a few weeks ago, thinking some day
>> I'd write something more involved. I'm not very happy with it,
>> because, at least with coreutils, it runs for too long without
>> giving any progres
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Karl Berry wrote:
>>> A wild thought: what if gnulib-tool saved its output during a run, and
>>> then presented a *diff* of the new output and the old output? I at
>>> least would find that considerably more rea
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl Berry wrote:
>> A wild thought: what if gnulib-tool saved its output during a run, and
>> then presented a *diff* of the new output and the old output? I at
>> least would find that considerably more readable.
>>
>> (Along with a mention of the file w
Karl Berry wrote:
> A wild thought: what if gnulib-tool saved its output during a run, and
> then presented a *diff* of the new output and the old output? I at
> least would find that considerably more readable.
>
> (Along with a mention of the file where the full output can be found, of
> course
