Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Since you two have made relatively large changes recently,
>> what do you think of using the latest in a bug-fix-only coreutils release?
>
> The changes between commit 7a29e0093f4a87478cdf7b7c87786272d6f37dfe and today
> look reasonably safe. Most of new the libunistring test
Ian Beckwith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:25:53PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Considering the coreutils-8.3 build failures, I'm going to release
>> coreutils-8.4 soon, perhaps on Wednesday. A cursory review and
>> preliminary testing suggests that it will be safe to use the latest
>> from
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:25:53PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Considering the coreutils-8.3 build failures, I'm going to release
> coreutils-8.4 soon, perhaps on Wednesday. A cursory review and
> preliminary testing suggests that it will be safe to use the latest
> from gnulib. Since you two ha
Hi Jim,
> Since you two have made relatively large changes recently,
> what do you think of using the latest in a bug-fix-only coreutils release?
The changes between commit 7a29e0093f4a87478cdf7b7c87786272d6f37dfe and today
look reasonably safe. Most of new the libunistring tests won't affect cor
Hi Bruno and Eric,
Considering the coreutils-8.3 build failures, I'm going to release
coreutils-8.4 soon, perhaps on Wednesday. A cursory review and
preliminary testing suggests that it will be safe to use the latest
from gnulib. Since you two have made relatively large changes recently,
what do
