Thank you, both of you!
Have a nice weekend,
Marc
Am Fr., 15. Mai 2020 um 23:04 Uhr schrieb Bruno Haible :
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I don't think we need to go that far, since c-stack is already using
> > ignore_value. I installed the attached.
>
> You beat me to it by 2 minutes :)
>
> I verified that
Hi Paul,
> I don't think we need to go that far, since c-stack is already using
> ignore_value. I installed the attached.
You beat me to it by 2 minutes :)
I verified that the patch fixes the warning that occurred with
./configure CPPFLAGS="-Wall -DDEBUG" --with-libsigsegv-prefix=...
Bruno
On 5/14/20 7:01 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> This will be a nice use case for the newly created attribute module
> and MAYBE_UNUSED.
I don't think we need to go that far, since c-stack is already using
ignore_value. I installed the attached.
>From c8c5f321dd10b21c8ad55f5c134c93235ffc9930 M
Hi Bruno,
there is one more issue with c-stack when all warnings are enabled
(and the DEBUG flag is set):
c-stack.c: In function ‘segv_handler’:
c-stack.c:175:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’, declared
with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
175 | write (STDERR_FILEN
Hi Marc,
> Please add
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> # include
> #endif
>
> at the beginning of c-stack.c.
>
> When the DEBUG flag is enabled, c-stack.c uses sprintf and without the
> suggested addition gcc complains about an implicit declaration of the
> function sprintf.
Yup. Thanks for the suggestion.
Please add
#ifdef DEBUG
# include
#endif
at the beginning of c-stack.c.
When the DEBUG flag is enabled, c-stack.c uses sprintf and without the
suggested addition gcc complains about an implicit declaration of the
function sprintf.
Thanks,
Marc
