Re: bug#41558: Regexp Bug

2020-09-22 Thread Jim Meyering
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:40 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > On 9/22/20 4:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > > Does anyone know if there's a glibc bug number for it? > > I looked for one and didn't find it, so I created glibc bug 26653 for it. See: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 Nice

Re: bug#41558: Regexp Bug

2020-09-22 Thread Paul Eggert
On 9/22/20 4:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Does anyone know if there's a glibc bug number for it? I looked for one and didn't find it, so I created glibc bug 26653 for it. See: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26653

Re: bug#41558: Regexp Bug

2020-09-22 Thread Jim Meyering
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:30 PM Norihiro Tanaka wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 21:14:12 -0700 > "anton.paras" wrote: > > > I posted to Stack Exchange, and they recommended that I file a bug. I'd > > rather not copy+paste it all, so here's the link: > > > > > > > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/q

Re: bug#41558: Regexp Bug

2020-05-27 Thread Norihiro Tanaka
On Tue, 26 May 2020 21:14:12 -0700 "anton.paras" wrote: > I posted to Stack Exchange, and they recommended that I file a bug. I'd > rather not copy+paste it all, so here's the link: > > > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/579889/why-doesnt-this-sed-command-replace-the-3rd-to-last-a