Re: broken memchr

2009-06-08 Thread Simon Josefsson
nulib-simple-gaggia > > The updated test-memchr is passing on your autobuilder; which version of > glibc do you have on that machine? Version 2.7. It is an Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (virtual) machine. > We know the broken memchr on x86_64 is in 2.10 but not current glibc > (which will become 2

Re: broken memchr

2009-06-08 Thread Eric Blake
/#000-gnulib-simple-gaggia The updated test-memchr is passing on your autobuilder; which version of glibc do you have on that machine? We know the broken memchr on x86_64 is in 2.10 but not current glibc (which will become 2.11), and based on the glibc release notes, I don't think the bug was pres

Re: broken memchr

2009-05-26 Thread Simon Josefsson
even without the use of efence. Sounds good to me. > And with the recent thread of memchr also being broken on x86_64, I'm > starting > to think that we need to do something like this. I don't have access to > either > x86_64 or alpha, so I don't know if this is

broken memchr (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.)

2009-05-26 Thread Eric Blake
omething like this. I don't have access to either x86_64 or alpha, so I don't know if this is sufficient to detect the broken memchr implementations out there; comments are welcome on whether we should polish and apply this patch. From: Eric Blake Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:03:26 -0600