Bruno Haible wrote:
Oh, I see. So, you mean native Windows.
Fixed:
Wonderful, thank you.
Adrian Ebeling wrote:
> I'm talking about systems that have *neither* pathconf() nor fpathconf().
Oh, I see. So, you mean native Windows.
Fixed:
2020-12-20 Bruno Haible
backupfile: Fix compilation error on native Windows (regr. 2018-10-23).
Reported by Adrian Ebeling in
On 18.12.20 17:48, Bruno Haible wrote:
lib/backupfile.c contains a feature check for pathconf()
(HAVE_PATHCONF), but later on fpathconf() is used without a check.
Therefore, the file can't be compiled on systems that don't have pathconf.
On which system is this? In our experience, the systems
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Ebeling wrote:
> lib/backupfile.c contains a feature check for pathconf()
> (HAVE_PATHCONF), but later on fpathconf() is used without a check.
> Therefore, the file can't be compiled on systems that don't have pathconf.
On which system is this? In our experience, the systems tha
Hi,
lib/backupfile.c contains a feature check for pathconf()
(HAVE_PATHCONF), but later on fpathconf() is used without a check.
Therefore, the file can't be compiled on systems that don't have pathconf.
Please add a check for fpathconf(), similar to the pathconf() check in
lines 44-46.
Regards,
