Re: automated CI testing

2017-05-18 Thread Tim Rühsen
On 05/17/2017 09:43 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:20:33PM +0200, Tim Rühsen wrote: >> On Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2017 19:09:52 CEST Bruno Haible wrote: >>> >>> > What about automated / CI testing ? > >>> [...] Therefo

Re: automated CI testing

2017-05-18 Thread Tim Rühsen
bineb3WvVyDgw.bin Description: PGP/MIME version identification encrypted.asc Description: OpenPGP encrypted message

Re: automated CI testing

2017-05-17 Thread Assaf Gordon
Hello, On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:20:33PM +0200, Tim Rühsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2017 19:09:52 CEST Bruno Haible wrote: > What about automated / CI testing ? [...] Therefore what is more valuable for gnulib (IMO) is automated testing on 20 different platforms. Of course everyb

Re: automated CI testing

2017-05-17 Thread Tim Rühsen
On Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2017 19:09:52 CEST Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Tim, > > > What about automated / CI testing ? > > We (the Wget maintainers) recently set up a group 'gnuwget' on Gitlab > > with CI runners (Debian, CentOS, Fedora). I could add gnulib as a &g

Re: automated CI testing

2017-05-17 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Tim, > What about automated / CI testing ? > We (the Wget maintainers) recently set up a group 'gnuwget' on Gitlab > with CI runners (Debian, CentOS, Fedora). I could add gnulib as a > project so that it can use these runners as well. The only thing to do > for the g