Re: attributes pure and const

Jim Meyering wrote: > Bruno Haible wrote: >> I would think that >> >> is higher priority. > > I investigated a little and reported it to the git list. > This reply makes me think a release will soon include the fix: > > http:/

Re: attributes pure and const

e and reported it to the git list. This reply makes me think a release will soon include the fix: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=130380478428809&w=2 I should be able to test it today. > I have been able to get speedups of more than 5% by judiciously placing > &#

Re: attributes pure and const

.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-04/msg00232.html> is higher priority. I have been able to get speedups of more than 5% by judiciously placing 'inline' keywords before function definitions. I think that's much more promising than providing the attributes 'pure' and