On 2023-09-04 15:44, Bruno Haible wrote:
- fs = 0;
+ fs = NULL;
This use of 0 probably dates back to when the GNU Coding Standards said,
in effect "Don't bother changing 0 to NULL when it doesn't affect
semantics."
I've been gradually switching code to use nullptr instead
The argp code still uses 0 to denote a null pointer, like in the 1980ies.
It makes the code harder to understand than necessary.
2023-09-04 Bruno Haible
argp: Distinguish NULL and '\0' from 0.
* lib/argp-pin.c: Include .
(program_invocation_
