Re: another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-12 Thread Tim Rice
Hi Bruno, On Sun, 11 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote: > What did you mean by "best not to use __base on these platforms", > when 4 lines below, the code does > # define _base __base The define is because the FILE structure does have __base but not _base. Now the comment next that member says /*

Re: another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-11 Thread Tim Rice
Hi Bruno, On Sun, 11 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote: > Tim Rice wrote: > > ./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/var/tmp --with-tests \ > > --single-configure --avoid=havelib-tests fseterr freadable fwritable \ > > fbufmode freading fwriting freadptr freadseek freadahead fpurge fseeko > >

Re: another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Tim Rice wrote: > ./gnulib-tool --create-testdir --dir=/var/tmp --with-tests \ > --single-configure --avoid=havelib-tests fseterr freadable fwritable \ > fbufmode freading fwriting freadptr freadseek freadahead fpurge fseeko > ftello fpending fflush Yes, this is the way to test these

Re: another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Tim Rice wrote: > * lib/fflush.c: Update comments for UnixWare > * lib/fpending.c: Likewise. > * lib/freadable.c: Likewise. > * lib/freadptr.c: Likewise. > * lib/freadseek.c: Likewise. > * lib/fseterr.c: Likewise. > * lib/fwritable.c: Likewise

Re: another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Tim Rice wrote: > 2020-09-30 Tim Rice > * lib/stdio-impl.h: Add support for UnixWare I prefer to use the ifdefs that we found a couple of days ago. What did you mean by "best not to use __base on these platforms", when 4 lines below, the code does # define _base __base 2020-10-11

another stdio patch for UnixWare

2020-10-01 Thread Tim Rice
I have attached an additional patch for the stdio parts 2020-09-30 Tim Rice * lib/stdio-impl.h: Add support for UnixWare * lib/freadahead.c: Use __fpending on UnixWare * lib/fflush.c: Update comments for UnixWare * lib/fpending.c: Likewise. * lib/freadab