Re: a note about strerror_r

On 2010-11-09 I wrote: > glibc also has a second function __xpg_strerror_r, which it enables under > the name strerror_r when _POSIX_C_SOURCE is defined to 200112L. But this > function is also not POSIX compliant, as I've just reported: >

a note about strerror_r

Eric Blake wrote: > strerror_r has its own set of portability problems, since the glibc > signature disagrees with the POSIX signature. glibc also has a second function __xpg_strerror_r, which it enables under the name strerror_r when _POSIX_C_SOURCE is defined to 200112L. But this function is als