Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Both patches installed, as proposed.
Thanks!
>> However, I'm not sure this is the Right Thing. Why doesn't it work to
>> include winsock2.h under cygwin? I.e., what's in your config.log when
>> the above happen?
>
> On cygwin, you have a choice for sock
Simon Josefsson extundo.com> writes:
>
> There is a potential problem here, if sockpfaf is ever used without
> the sys_socket, but there is no such module today. Maybe the
> sockpfaf.m4 file should be moved into the sys_socket module?
As long as the dependency is satisfied, with gl_HEADER_SYS_
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson extundo.com> writes:
>
>>
>> This patch makes sockpfaf define HAVE_IPV? properly when
>> cross-compiling to mingw32. (For reference, IPv4 is detected, but not
>> IPv6.)
>
> And it broke compilation on cygwin, where you should use POSIX he
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
>> $ gnulib-tool --test getaddrinfo
>> ...
>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../lib -I.. -Wall -O2 -
>> c ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c
>> ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c: In function `getnameinfo':
>> ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c:324: error:
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> $ gnulib-tool --test getaddrinfo
> ...
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../lib -I.. -Wall -O2 -
> c ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c
> ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c: In function `getnameinfo':
> ../../lib/getaddrinfo.c:324: error: `NI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared (first use in
> this
Simon Josefsson extundo.com> writes:
>
> This patch makes sockpfaf define HAVE_IPV? properly when
> cross-compiling to mingw32. (For reference, IPv4 is detected, but not
> IPv6.)
And it broke compilation on cygwin, where you should use POSIX headers instead
of sucking in Windows headers and g
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon,
>
>> Ok to install the patch? You're mentioned as the origin of the file.
>
> Sure. You don't need to ask me: I'm not mentioned as maintainer of this
> file in modules/*.
Done.
The M4 macro doesn't seem to belong to one canonical module, so I wa
Simon,
> Ok to install the patch? You're mentioned as the origin of the file.
Sure. You don't need to ask me: I'm not mentioned as maintainer of this
file in modules/*.
Bruno
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I'd admit that these winsock2.h tests are a bit ugly, but I don't see
>> a good alternative. Ideas?
>
> I don't see a better alternative. The problem is that the replacement
> is not available at the moment the autoconf test is
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I'd admit that these winsock2.h tests are a bit ugly, but I don't see
> a good alternative. Ideas?
I don't see a better alternative. The problem is that the replacement
is not available at the moment the autoconf test is run.
We cannot change that easily.
Bruno
This patch makes sockpfaf define HAVE_IPV? properly when
cross-compiling to mingw32. (For reference, IPv4 is detected, but not
IPv6.)
I'd admit that these winsock2.h tests are a bit ugly, but I don't see
a good alternative. Ideas?
--- sockpfaf.m4 16 Jun 2006 17:36:05 +0200 1.2
+++ sockpfaf
11 matches
Mail list logo
