On 01/31/2013 03:54 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 03:13 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> By the way, until this bug is fixed, a reasonable workaround is to pass
>> --with-included-regex to configure.
>>
>>
>> On 30 January 2013 13:50, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> When running the test for workin
On 01/31/2013 03:13 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> By the way, until this bug is fixed, a reasonable workaround is to pass
> --with-included-regex to configure.
>
>
> On 30 January 2013 13:50, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
>> When running the test for working re_compile_pattern, I get a hang;
>> attaching
By the way, until this bug is fixed, a reasonable workaround is to pass
--with-included-regex to configure.
On 30 January 2013 13:50, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> When running the test for working re_compile_pattern, I get a hang;
> attaching to the process gives me:
>
> (gdb) where
> #0 __lll_lock_
When running the test for working re_compile_pattern, I get a hang;
attaching to the process gives me:
(gdb) where
#0 __lll_lock_wait_private () at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:93
#1 0x2ab6dd5c6221 in _L_lock_10625 () at malloc.c:5209
#2 0x2ab6dd5c3fa7 in __GI__