Tim Rice wrote:
> This was more for reference than asking to add for support for OpenServer 5.
OK.
> > sense, since SCO OpenServer 5 is a museum system, as you can see
>
> True, old.
Glad you acknowledge that.
> Just please do not remove any bits related to OpenServe
t;
> > ...
> >
> > Still a current product.
>
> SCO OpenServer 5 is not supported by Gnulib [1].
Not surprising. It's a pain to work with.
> Adding support for SCO OpenServer 5 to any Gnulib module would make no
This was more for reference than asking to add for supp
Tim Rice wrote:
> OpenServer 5 uses 'unsigned short'.
> ...
> tim@timosr5d 6% egrep 'gid_t|uid_t' /usr/include/sys/types.h
> typedef unsigned short uid_t;
> typedef unsigned short gid_t;
> ...
>
> Still a current product.
SCO OpenServer 5 is not supp
Hi Benji,
> > It is better, but there are still (minor) things to tweak.
> Minor things tweaked.
>
> I'm not sure why I cast getpid to int.
>
> Including string.h did fix the strrchr warning.
>
> Now using __SCO_SERVER__ || __sysv5__ for OpenServer6/UnixWare7 and SCO
> cc/GCC detection.
Thank
It is better, but there are still (minor) things to tweak.
Minor things tweaked.
I'm not sure why I cast getpid to int.
Including string.h did fix the strrchr warning.
Now using __SCO_SERVER__ || __sysv5__ for OpenServer6/UnixWare7 and SCO
cc/GCC detection.
Also as far as the indentation
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
> I hope the main conclusions from the table [1] stand?
Yes.
> Bruno
>
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2020-10/msg00022.html
>
--
Tim RiceMultitalents
t...@multitalents.net
Tim Rice wrote:
> > out, namely that *none* of the 6 compilers that he tested defines both
> > __USLC__ and __SCO_VERSION__.
>
> Actually the table *does* show __USLC__ and __SCO_VERSION__ defined
> in the native compiler for both Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7.
Oops, you are right. Seems I have pro
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Benji Wiebe wrote:
> > http://osr600doc.sco.com/en/man/html.CP/cc.CP.html#cc_preassertion
> >
> > Is where the predefined constants for the builtin cc are listed.
>
> Thanks. You will notice that this web page says that both __USLC__ and
> __SCO_VERSION_
Hi Tim,
> > OK. And what about __UNIXWARE__ and __OPENSERVER__ that I see being used
> > [1]?
> > On which versions are they defined?
>
> For the most part __UNIXWARE__ and __OPENSERVER__ were used by some in
> build driver scripts. Usually like CFLAGS="-O -D__UNIXWARE__"
Since you say "by some
Benji Wiebe wrote:
> http://osr600doc.sco.com/en/man/html.CP/cc.CP.html#cc_preassertion
>
> Is where the predefined constants for the builtin cc are listed.
Thanks. You will notice that this web page says that both __USLC__ and
__SCO_VERSION__ are defined. Which contradicts what Tim Rice just fou
constants for the builtin cc are listed. Do we need to
> support a possible future port of clang to SCO OpenServer when OpenServer is
> dead?
>
> Or just make it work with the current compilers available? (SCO's cc and GCC)
Just make it work for current compilers available.
A
http://osr600doc.sco.com/en/man/html.CP/cc.CP.html#cc_preassertion
Is where the predefined constants for the builtin cc are listed. Do we
need to support a possible future port of clang to SCO OpenServer when
OpenServer is dead?
Or just make it work with the current compilers available
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
> OK. And what about __UNIXWARE__ and __OPENSERVER__ that I see being used [1]?
> On which versions are they defined?
For the most part __UNIXWARE__ and __OPENSERVER__ were used by some in
build driver scripts. Usually like CFLAGS="-O -D__UNIXWARE__"
As y
Tim Rice wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
>
> > Tim Rice wrote:
> > > > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
> > >
> > > While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
>
Hi Bruno,
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Tim Rice wrote:
> > > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
> >
> > While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
> > what is normally used for 6 and 7 is __USLC__ f
[Re-adding bug-gnulib back in CC. Please keep bug-gnulib in CC.]
Benji Wiebe wrote:
> Hey thanks a lot for the feedback Bruno and Tim! My C is sort of rusty
> right now. I believe I've addressed all your concerns and suggestions in
> the patch below.
>
> Thanks again!
It is better, but there a
Tim Rice wrote:
> > +# elif defined __SCO_VERSION__ /* SCO OpenServer/UnixWare */
>
> While __SCO_VERSION__ covers Openserver 6 and UnixWare 7,
> what is normally used for 6 and 7 is __USLC__ for the native compiler
> and __sysv5__ for gcc
>
> Ie.
> # elif defined __
Oh and I forgot to mention, the cast from strrchr is needed to silence a
warning from SCO's CC:
UX:acomp: WARNING: "gpn_test.c", line 16: improper pointer/integer
combination: op "="
Hi Benji,
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020, Benji Wiebe wrote:
> I ported the getprogname module to SCO OpenServer 6 (should also work on OSR5
> and UnixWare). It prevents several OSS packages from building.
No proc filesystem on Openserver 5 so it will not work there. Would
need a different "
Hi Benji,
> I just made it read from /proc//cmdline to get the command name.
> The patch is below. Comments are welcome. Thanks!
Thanks for the patch. I have a couple of improvement suggestions, though:
> + char buf[50];
> + char *ret;
> + int fd;
> + int pathlen;
Can you try to minimize t
I ported the getprogname module to SCO OpenServer 6 (should also work on
OSR5 and UnixWare). It prevents several OSS packages from building.
I just made it read from /proc//cmdline to get the command name.
The patch is below. Comments are welcome. Thanks!
-Benji
diff --git a/lib
21 matches
Mail list logo
