> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:54:41 +0100
> From: Pádraig Brady
> CC: bug-gnulib@gnu.org
>
> Pushed the attached, thanks.
Great, thanks.
On 06/10/2014 03:43 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:42:22 +0100
>> From: Pádraig Brady
>> CC: bug-gnulib@gnu.org
>>
>>> . The value is constant: every call to 'times' within the same
>>> process returns the same value. Callers generally expect the
>>> value to chan
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:42:22 +0100
> From: Pádraig Brady
> CC: bug-gnulib@gnu.org
>
> > . The value is constant: every call to 'times' within the same
> > process returns the same value. Callers generally expect the
> > value to change, since Posix says the value is the elapsed ti
On 06/08/2014 04:23 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> The gnulib implementation of 'times' for MS-Windows uses the process
> creation time returned by the GetProcessTimes API to construct the
> value that the function should return.
>
> This has 2 problems:
>
> . The value is constant: every call to '
The gnulib implementation of 'times' for MS-Windows uses the process
creation time returned by the GetProcessTimes API to construct the
value that the function should return.
This has 2 problems:
. The value is constant: every call to 'times' within the same
process returns the same value.
