Re: xalloc-die-tests

2009-11-17 Thread Simon Josefsson
Simon Josefsson writes: > One though on the changes is that if we use a shell script to wrap > running the binary, we'd might as well make the shell script check that > the xalloc-die binary returns a non-0 exit code and drop the XFAIL_TESTS > approach for the module. But I don't care strongly a

Re: xalloc-die-tests

2009-11-17 Thread Simon Josefsson
Thanks Eric and Jim. One though on the changes is that if we use a shell script to wrap running the binary, we'd might as well make the shell script check that the xalloc-die binary returns a non-0 exit code and drop the XFAIL_TESTS approach for the module. But I don't care strongly about it. /S

Re: xalloc-die-tests

2009-11-16 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: > That failed to link when run in isolation (./gnulib-tool --with-tests > --test xalloc-die). Plus it leaked a message to stderr, which in turn > showed that we were depending on unportable printf("%s",NULL) behavior. > This cleans it up. > diff --git a/tests/test-xalloc-die.sh

Re: xalloc-die-tests

2009-11-16 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Simon Josefsson on 11/15/2009 9:20 AM: > Pushed. > > /Simon > >>From a31c6b23b94970756cf070ab279bb6e5e6af0156 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Simon Josefsson > Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:20:06 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Add xalloc-die sel