On 2025-01-18 Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2025-01-18 11:45, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > On 2025-01-18 Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> Does the unaligned read trick work even with CheriBSD's memory-safe
> >> model? That is an edge case that might need an ifdef or something.
> >>
> >
> > I'm not familiar with C
On 2025-01-18 11:45, Lasse Collin wrote:
On 2025-01-18 Paul Eggert wrote:
Does the unaligned read trick work even with CheriBSD's memory-safe
model? That is an edge case that might need an ifdef or something.
I'm not familiar with CheriBSD but the trick never crosses a cache line
boundary (or
On 2025-01-18 Paul Eggert wrote:
> Does the unaligned read trick work even with CheriBSD's memory-safe
> model? That is an edge case that might need an ifdef or something.
I'm not familiar with CheriBSD but the trick never crosses a cache line
boundary (or page boundary). So the memory-safe model
On 2025-01-18 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Valgrind was a tool without replacement, for many years, when
> sanitizers did not exist. Nowadays, however, I generally prefer
> testing with sanitizers than with valgrind because there are some
> bugs that ASAN finds and valgrind doesn't [1]. For example, when
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Does the unaligned read trick work even with CheriBSD's memory-safe
> model? That is an edge case that might need an ifdef or something.
Good question...
> The aligned read trick reminds me a bit of the "adding 0 to a null
> pointer gives you a null pointer" trick. That als
On 2025-01-18 07:48, Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list wrote:
Regarding your trick to do an aligned read on (addr & -alignment) instead
of an unaligned read on (addr): I find it good that ASAN catches this,
because this trick amounts to exploiting a coincidental property of current
hardware
Lasse Collin wrote:
> About sanitizers: They can be annoying with SIMD code. If a function is
> passed an unaligned buffer, it would be fine to round the address down
> to an aligned value, do an aligned read, and ignore the out-of-bounds
> bytes. One can do it in assembly because sanitizers don't