Paul Eggert wrote:
> It's simpler to omit the /*extern*/ as it's just noise
> in that context. I installed the attached.
top/maint.mk line 604 still does not catch 'xalloc_die'.
With this patch, it should do so.
2023-06-09 Bruno Haible
maint.mk: Regenerate regex to include xalloc_d
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 3:39 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 05:34, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > I noticed some syntax-check failures in diffutils.
> > Its uses of relatively new xinmalloc and xpmalloc functions triggered a
> > "make syntax-check" failure claiming that xalloc.h need not be inclu
On 2023-06-09 03:38, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I think this misses xalloc_die due to the "extern"
adjustments in gnulib 3801e9bb67b.
It seems that the perl regexps in the comment need to be adjusted
to cater for the commented /*extern*/
Let's not bother. It's simpler to omit the /*extern*/ as it's
On 07/06/2023 05:34, Jim Meyering wrote:
I noticed some syntax-check failures in diffutils.
Its uses of relatively new xinmalloc and xpmalloc functions triggered a
"make syntax-check" failure claiming that xalloc.h need not be included,
because none of its (old list) functions was used. This upda
Hi Jim,
> 'print Regexp::Assemble->new(file => "/dev/stdin")->as_string'
Thanks. The README at https://github.com/ronsavage/Regexp-Assemble is nice
to read.
Bruno
On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 1:38 AM Bruno Haible wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > regenerate regex to reflect new functions in xalloc.h
>
> How did you do that? By hand, or using some of the techniques from [1] or [2]?
Hi Bruno, the comments just above include the commands I ran to create
the resultin
Jim Meyering wrote:
> regenerate regex to reflect new functions in xalloc.h
How did you do that? By hand, or using some of the techniques from [1] or [2]?
Just curious.
Bruno
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7432830/
[2] https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/16860/
