Re: tests: remove unnecessary dependency

2011-06-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > I seem to recall that the mere use of the progname module was sufficient > to satisfy a link failure that would otherwise occur if error() is > called (via xmalloc or similar), even if the test-foo.c didn't directly > use "progname.h". Yes, this can happen. In these cases, it i

Re: tests: remove unnecessary dependency

2011-06-20 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/17/2011 08:39 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > The following test files don't include "progname.h" although their module > description asks for the 'progname' module. I seem to recall that the mere use of the progname module was sufficient to satisfy a link failure that would otherwise occur if err