Thanks for +1 Bruno, I have pushed the commits below. More history or
insight on how to think about use of these types would be great. My
recollection was that these types were preferred for compatibility with
ancient C tools that didn't parse 'unsigned char' etc.
/Simon
From 2adbe3be9e278cfc662
On 5/6/24 5:38 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> sc_unsigned_int:
>> @prohibit=u''_int \
>> halt='don'\''t use u''_int; instead use unsigned int' \
>> $(_sc_search_regexp)
> Sounds good to me. My only suggestion is to move the sc_unsigned_long
> rule after the sc_unsigned_int rul
Hi Simon,
> How about adding inetutils u_* syntax-checks to gnulib's maint.mk?
>
> sc_unsigned_char:
> @prohibit=u''_char \
> halt='don'\''t use u''_char; instead use unsigned char' \
> $(_sc_search_regexp)
>
> sc_unsigned_long:
> @prohibit=u''_long \
>