Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Any objections to this patch?
>
> Yes, I object.
>
> Some people/projects prefer implicit conversions over explicit casts (e.g.
> Paul, coreutils). Some people/projects prefer explicit casts over implicit
> conversions (e.g. me,
> I ran 'make syntax-check' (from gnulib's maint.mk) and it detected some
> problems in code in gnulib itself
These are not problems in the code. You better avoid to apply this coding
conventions checker against a file that is written with different coding
conventions.
Just a litt
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Any objections to this patch?
Yes, I object.
Some people/projects prefer implicit conversions over explicit casts (e.g.
Paul, coreutils). Some people/projects prefer explicit casts over implicit
conversions (e.g. me, gettext). We've discussed this issue on this list
a few
