Re: split off module mkdirat from module openat

2011-11-04 Thread Paul Eggert
On 11/04/11 03:54, Bruno Haible wrote: > - openat uses lib/at-func.c, which includes , thus requires module > 'dirent'. Thanks for all that work. This particular change prompted me to look into why at-func.c includes dirent.h via openat.h, and this inclusion appears to be no longer needed,

Re: split off module mkdirat from module openat

2011-11-04 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > This patch is tested on a dozen of platforms as well, like the other ones. > > Here's a proposed fixup for some small omissions in the module descriptions. > - fchmodat, fchownat, linkat, renameat use lib/at-func.c or lib/at-func2.c > which requires openat_save_fail from

Re: split off module mkdirat from module openat

2011-11-04 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > Looks fine. Push away. I've pushed it. Bruno -- In memoriam Yitzhak Rabin

Re: split off module mkdirat from module openat

2011-11-04 Thread Bruno Haible
> This proposed patch splits off module mkdirat from module openat. This patch is tested on a dozen of platforms as well, like the other ones. Here's a proposed fixup for some small omissions in the module descriptions. - fchmodat, fchownat, linkat, renameat use lib/at-func.c or lib/at-func2.c

Re: split off module mkdirat from module openat

2011-11-04 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible wrote: > This proposed patch splits off module mkdirat from module openat. > > 2011-11-04 Bruno Haible > > New module 'mkdirat', split off from module 'openat'. > * m4/mkdirat.m4: New file. extracted from m4/openat.m4. > * m4/openat.m4 (gl_FUNC_OPENAT): Don't requi