Sylvain writes:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:10:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> After waiting about 72 hours, I received no comments, whether positive,
>> negative, or neutral, so I applied this to master.
>
> Thanks much!
You're welcome!
(If anything else comes up, please feel free to ping me
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:10:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> After waiting about 72 hours, I received no comments, whether positive,
> negative, or neutral, so I applied this to master.
Thanks much!
--
Sylvain
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:51:38PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:08:26PM +0200, Sylvain wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:48:19PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > Sylvain writes:
> > >
> > > > It's been a while (1 year 1/2) since
> > > > http://lists.debian.or
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 08:08:26PM +0200, Sylvain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:48:19PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Sylvain writes:
> >
> > > It's been a while (1 year 1/2) since
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/05/msg00032.html and I still
> > > need to manually patch
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 01:48:19PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Sylvain writes:
>
> > It's been a while (1 year 1/2) since
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/05/msg00032.html and I still
> > need to manually patch gnulib before releasing.
> >
> > If I assume the relocatable-prog module
Sylvain writes:
> It's been a while (1 year 1/2) since
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2012/05/msg00032.html and I still
> need to manually patch gnulib before releasing.
>
> If I assume the relocatable-prog module is not maintained, that I'm
> probably the only person on earth to use it, an
