On 1/4/07, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Generally speaking, I find it easiest just to sync all of gnulib.
That's what everyone else does. It's simpler, since you don't need
to worry so much about integration hassles within gnulib.
[...]
If you take gnulib snapshots, you can diff the
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll consider myself notified.Apart from that bugfix are there any
> other essential changes I should import, or are you suggesting I
> update the whole of gnulib to current CVS?
Generally speaking, I find it easiest just to sync all of gnulib.
T
On 12/25/06, Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The 'tar' version is correct. But this is not an Autoconf issue; it
is a gnulib version issue. The gnulib fix (dated March 25) is here:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnulib/gnulib/m4/regex.m4?r1=1.50&r2=1.51
but apparently findutils is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> One difference I noted in the test code used between tar-1.16.1 and
> findutils-4.2.29 (2.60 vs 2.60a) was:
>
> tar: s = re_compile_pattern ("a[[:]:]]b\n", 11, ®ex);
> findutils: s = re_compile_pattern ("a[:]:]b\n", 9, ®ex);
>
> A printf in both shows that tar say
