"Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was under the impression that license texts were
> essentially in the public domain, but that's probably not true.
Yes, it's not true. In fact, it's more the reverse. License texts
themselves typically have the most-restrictive license that the
Simon Josefsson extundo.com> writes:
> I'm not sure how to best describe this. I note that the fdl module
> has the same problem:
>
> doc/fdl.texi
> ...
> License:
> public domain
>
> How about a new license 'unmodifiable license text', which we fix in
> gnulib-tool to be compatible wi
On Wednesday, August 30, 2006 at 09:27, Simon Josefsson wrote:
[..]
> > +public domain
>
> This seems wrong though, the license of the GPL is:
>
> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
> of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
>
> I'm not sure how to
"Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw the fdl module, which is nice because my GNU project GMediaServer uses
> fdl.texi in its documentation. It however also uses gpl.texi, which is why I
> propose this module.
Good idea.
> +License:
> +public domain
This seems wrong though, the
