> 2) Similarly for texinfo.tex:
It would be better for packages using gnulib to get texinfo.tex from
gnulib. It's (nearly always) newer.
Of course, not all automake-using packages use gnulib. So then getting
texinfo.tex from automake is useful (I guess).
So, does automake refrain from inst
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson writes:
>> So I don't see where the conflict is.
>
> We do not yet have a conflict. But we nearly have it:
>
> 1) If fdl.texi gets distributed by automake as well, we get a conflict:
>"automake -a" and "gnulib-tool --update" would inst
Eric Blake writes:
> > You had the earlier proposal of making automake be smart enough to install
> > the latest upstream version of docs, rather than the version that was
> > current when automake was released (but most likely out of date at the
> > time that automake is used on a package). If t
Eric Blake wrote:
> >>* gnulib-tool: Avoid space-tab.
> ...
> emacs whitespace mode converts them to plain
> tab. Using tab-space instead makes it obvious that both characters were
> intended, without having to fight editors trying to collapse them.
Thanks for explaining.
Bruno
Eric Blake wrote:
> Okay to apply this?
>
> 2006-07-11 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * gnulib-tool: List --doc-base before --tests-base.
Yes, please. It's fine.
Bruno
Bruno Haible clisp.org> writes:
> Also, in the patch, I would mention --doc-base before --tests-base.
> (tests-base is used only when --with-tests is specified, whereas doc-base
> is used always.)
Okay to apply this?
2006-07-11 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnulib-tool: List --doc
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> * modules/fdl: New module, for grabbing fdl.texi.
>>
>> Automake is distributing COPYING and texinfo.tex. Why would you have
>> fdl.texi distributed by gnulib-tool, not by automake? I would not like
>> to see conflicts arise between automake and gnul
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to Simon Josefsson on 7/11/2006 2:49 AM:
>> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> In the m4 project, I wanted to update the documentation to include
>>> the FDL in an appendix. gnulib contains doc/fdl.texi, but did not
>>> have any easy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 7/11/2006 2:49 AM:
> Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> In the m4 project, I wanted to update the documentation to include
>> the FDL in an appendix. gnulib contains doc/fdl.texi, but did not
>> have any easy
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the m4 project, I wanted to update the documentation to include
> the FDL in an appendix. gnulib contains doc/fdl.texi, but did not
> have any easy way to import it over to m4. Would this patch be
> acceptable to allow documentation to be pulled in as
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the m4 project, I wanted to update the documentation to include the FDL in
> an appendix. gnulib contains doc/fdl.texi, but did not have any easy way to
> import it over to m4. Would this patch be acceptable to allow documentation
> to
> be pulled
11 matches
Mail list logo
