> I know it's a pain to update lgpl-2.1.texi,
I'll ask Brett if there is any prospect of updating the v2 license text.
recommendations were synced with regards to listing the same address.
gpl-howto.html is in sync with v3. I guess it could at least explicitly
say that it is ok to use
On 05/02/2012 10:16 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I know it's a pain to update lgpl-2.1.texi, even if the update is not
> part of the official license, but it would be nicer if the two
> recommendations were synced with regards to listing the same address.
It would be nicer, but updating license text (n
