Re: posixtm failure on Solaris

2021-01-01 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > > Since, as you said, it's not worth worrying about, > > I would guess that there is no need to update the documentation? > > Yes, the posixtm bug's not worth worrying about. However the underlying > localtime issue might be worth a mention. Nice. I would not have know what

Re: posixtm failure on Solaris

2020-12-31 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/31/20 3:43 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: Since, as you said, it's not worth worrying about, I would guess that there is no need to update the documentation? Yes, the posixtm bug's not worth worrying about. However the underlying localtime issue might be worth a mention. I was feeling energetic

Re: posixtm failure

2011-02-11 Thread Paul Eggert
On 02/11/2011 11:18 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > The problem appears to be inside gnulib's __mktime_internal. It is still > present after Paul's recent patches: On MacOS X 10.5, after configuring > with CC="gcc -m64", I get: > > 0101.00 mismatch (-: actual; +:expected) > --62167132800 >

Re: posixtm failure

2011-02-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Eric, Eric Blake wrote: > > FAIL: test-posixtm (exit: 1) > > > > > > 0101.00 mismatch (-: actual; +:expected) > > --62167132800 > > +-62167219200 > > 12312359.59 return value mismatch: got 0, expected 1 > > > > This particular test comes from gnulib,