> I did not bump the argz.m4 serial again (I'm not sure what the
> rules are: bump on EVERY change
Personally I think it is highly desirable to change serial numbers
any time a new version is committed. One person's minor fix is another
person's critical stopper.
Hi Charles, Bruno,
* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
>
> Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
> with identical results.
Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno f
Charles Wilson wrote:
I'll generate and
test an additional patch addressing Bruno's concerns.
Attached. Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
with identical results.
I did not bump the argz.m4 serial again (I'm not su
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:57:13 +0200, "Bruno Haible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Lots of good comments...snipped]
As I was the originator of this change (though not its final form), and
because Ralf has already committed it to libtool cvs, I'll generate and
test an additional patch addressing Bruno's conc
Hi Ralf,
A bit of gnitpicking:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Here's what the gnulib patch looks like.
> + set x `uname -r | $SED -e 's/^\([[0-9\.]]*\).*/\1/'`
$SED is usually not defined in the context of autoconf macros that are
part of gnulib. (I.e. it expands to empty.) Just use 'sed' in
[ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/7314/focus=7498 ]
Thanks Charles for all your work on this. I installed this path into
Libtool HEAD, and pulled the changes over to gnulib. Here's what the
gnulib patch looks like.
Cheers,
Ralf
2007-04-25 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECT
