On 4/19/24 2:37 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> You're right. Maybe Dmitry wanted to have the full data structure
> available somewhere; but since the 'conditionals' and 'unconditionals'
> tables contain the same info in a different way, it's redundant.
>
> I would leave it in, for possible future uses,
Hi Collin,
> Patch 0001 does the same but uses a set instead of checking for
> membership in a list.
Thanks; applied.
> Also, am I missing something or are the sets/lists at
> self.dependers[str(module)] unused?
You're right. Maybe Dmitry wanted to have the full data structure
available somewhe
