Simon Josefsson wrote:
> This was also discovered while porting GNU SASL to uClinux.
>
> Perhaps I should investigate how difficult it would be to make uClinux
> run ./configure properly instead of maintaining the HAVE_* symbols
> manually.
Definitely. uClinux has a shell and a compilation environ
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> This was also discovered while porting GNU SASL to uClinux.
>>
>> Perhaps I should investigate how difficult it would be to make uClinux
>> run ./configure properly instead of maintaining the HAVE_* symbols
>> manually.
>
> Defin
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
>> at all, the header file fail to parse.
>
> What's the point in trying to use lib/getline.c without m4/getline.m4 ?
> We engage ourselves to maintain both in
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
> at all, the header file fail to parse. This uses the idiom that is
> suggested by the autoconf manual.
>
> 2005-08-23 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * getline.h (get
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about this? If for some reason HAVE_DECL_GETLINE is not defined
> at all, the header file fail to parse. This uses the idiom that is
> suggested by the autoconf manual.
>
> 2005-08-23 Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * getline.h (g
