Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Eric Blake on 11/12/2009 11:41 AM:
>> getgroups replaces a library function, so it should not exit(). On the other
>> hand, the mgetgroups interface from coreutils is much nicer to use (one call,
>> instead of 2); that would be a reasonable place to add an xalloc-d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 11/12/2009 11:41 AM:
> getgroups replaces a library function, so it should not exit(). On the other
> hand, the mgetgroups interface from coreutils is much nicer to use (one call,
> instead of 2); that would be a reasonabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jim Meyering on 11/13/2009 2:14 AM:
>> Any problems with committing this series?
>>
>> Eric Blake (5):
>> getgroups: fix logic error
>> getgroups: avoid calling exit
>> getgroups: provide stub for mingw
>> getgroups
Eric Blake wrote:
> These days, I'm not sure how many systems still need the getgroups replacement
> because the system getgroups is buggy. However, there is the issue of mingw,
> which lacks getgroups, and for that matter, any notion of group management
> (well, windows does have groups, as evide