I added an entry to gnulib/config/srclist.txt so that fdl.texi will be
synced from the gnustandards project. Having a separate copy floating
around on its own can't be a good thing.
karl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 11/11/2008 4:25 AM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> It just made my life as
>> autoconf maintainer easier to be able to add a line to cfg.mk that does
>> 'cp gnulib/doc/fdl.texi autoconf/doc/',
>
> This will work also when fdl.texi
Eric Blake wrote:
> It just made my life as
> autoconf maintainer easier to be able to add a line to cfg.mk that does
> 'cp gnulib/doc/fdl.texi autoconf/doc/',
This will work also when fdl.texi is simply a copy of fdl-1.3.texi.
Bruno
> A symlink?! This can only cause problems:
> - When 'git' is run on a Windows system (not Cygwin), AFAIK there are
> no symlinks.
In which case, git treats the file as a single line text, whose
contents would correspond to the symlink, but the contents of the
git tree make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 11/10/2008 8:30 PM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> I added a symlink fdl.texi
>> ...
>> Here's what I'm committing.
>> new file mode 12
>
> A symlink?! This can only cause problems:
> - When 'git' is run on a Windows system
Eric Blake wrote:
> I added a symlink fdl.texi
> ...
> Here's what I'm committing.
> new file mode 12
A symlink?! This can only cause problems:
- When 'git' is run on a Windows system (not Cygwin), AFAIK there are
no symlinks.
- When 'git' is run on Linux on a vfat file system, there a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Karl Berry on 11/10/2008 5:01 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] fdl.texi
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] fdl-1.3.texi
>
> I think standards.texi and maintain.texi should include the generic
> fdl.texi. I updated fdl.texi in the gnustandards repo to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fdl.texi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fdl-1.3.texi
I think standards.texi and maintain.texi should include the generic
fdl.texi. I updated fdl.texi in the gnustandards repo to be 1.3.
As for gnulib, I see that we have only specifically-numbered versions of
the {a,l,}gpl-*.texi and
Karl Berry freefriends.org> writes:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add GFDLv1.3.
> Will standards.texi be swapped to use this new license?
>
> I presume so, but I should ask rms.
Karl, I see with your latest autoupdate[1] that upstream standards.texi now
claims to use FDL 1.3, but still @incl
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
>
>> > Meanwhile, Simon, since you were just there, can you update the gnulib
>> > manual to FDL 1.3+?
>>
>> I'm not the copyright holder, but I expect concerned people will comment
>> if there is any problem in doin
Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
> > Meanwhile, Simon, since you were just there, can you update the gnulib
> > manual to FDL 1.3+?
>
> I'm not the copyright holder, but I expect concerned people will comment
> if there is any problem in doing this, so I have pushed the patch below.
You d
Karl Berry wrote:
> I was surprised to see the "1.2" used in so many places. The Emacs
> manual, for example, has this in subfiles:
>
> @c This is part of the Emacs manual.
> @c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2000,
> @c 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 20
true for getdate.texi: the file is added to packages via the getdate
Getdate is a special case. It is one of the very very few .texi files
that is actually used in multiple manuals.
That is, I'm not aware of any other manuals that use alloca*, etc., and
given the content, I can't really pict
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> I was surprised to see the "1.2" used in so many places. The Emacs
> manual, for example, has this in subfiles:
>
> @c This is part of the Emacs manual.
> @c Copyright (C) 1985, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2000,
> @c 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
so I have pushed the patch below.
Thanks. Not that I'm the copyright holder either.
doc/alloca-opt.texi |2 +-
doc/alloca.texi |2 +-
doc/c-ctype.texi|2 +-
...
I was surprised to see the "1.2" used in so many places. The Emacs
m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry) writes:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add GFDLv1.3.
> Will standards.texi be swapped to use this new license?
>
> I presume so, but I should ask rms.
>
> Meanwhile, Simon, since you were just there, can you update the gnulib
> manual to FDL 1.3+?
I'm not the copyrigh
> Subject: [PATCH] Add GFDLv1.3.
Will standards.texi be swapped to use this new license?
I presume so, but I should ask rms.
Meanwhile, Simon, since you were just there, can you update the gnulib
manual to FDL 1.3+?
Thanks,
Karl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Simon Josefsson on 11/4/2008 1:13 AM:
> I've pushed this.
>
> /Simon
>
>>From 4df5306dfde4dea1d9b4c027defe8471d0fc62c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:12:32 +0100
> Subject:
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've pushed this.
And this...
/Simon
>From c2deb4e15018dc6569cb9c42d0592854122bdde8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:13:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add modules/fdl-1.3, forgotten in last commi
19 matches
Mail list logo