Re: docs: update glibc progress

2012-02-28 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > while the current POSIX 2008 (Issue 7) only > requires C99, the next POSIX 1x (Issue 8) will likely require C11. So I > think uchar.texi belongs under posix-headers, or else we create a new > intermediate directory for c11-headers and c11-functions. I don't think POSIX will di

Re: docs: update glibc progress

2012-02-28 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/28/2012 05:06 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> Not listed: cygwin 1.7.10 added __fpurge, 1.7.11 added scandirat. >> Maybe it's worth creating pages under glibc-functions for those. > > You're right for scandirat. Done below. For __fpurge, I wouldn't mention > it since the prefi