Re: avoid creating sys/time.h replacement when possible

2007-01-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> - use $(SYS_TIME_H) also in the definition of MOSTLYCLEANFILES > > This is not a good change. Suppose a user does in the same directory > - first, a "./configure; make" for a deficient platform, > - then, a "./configure" for a g

Re: avoid creating sys/time.h replacement when possible

2007-01-28 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > - use $(SYS_TIME_H) also in the definition of MOSTLYCLEANFILES This is not a good change. Suppose a user does in the same directory - first, a "./configure; make" for a deficient platform, - then, a "./configure" for a glibc platform - then he notices that he forgot t

Re: avoid creating sys/time.h replacement when possible

2007-01-28 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Paul, Jim, > > Most developers are using glibc systems nowadays. When gnulib creates many > replacement header files on such systems, it makes look gnulib a bit > ridiculous. So can we avoid to create a header file when it's easy to do so? > Here is a pr