Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
>
>> Ah, ok, I thought you talked about the existing 'assert' module in
>> gnulib, which looks unrelated to what you are proposing.
>
> I'm actually thinking that that it would be better to make the
> existing assert
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
>> Couldn't a replacement assert.h look like:
>>
>> #include
>> #include "progname.h"
>>
>> #ifdef NDEBUG
>> # define assert(e) ((void) 0)
>> #else
>> # define assert(e) \
Simon Josefsson josefsson.org> writes:
> Ah, ok, I thought you talked about the existing 'assert' module in
> gnulib, which looks unrelated to what you are proposing.
I'm actually thinking that that it would be better to make the existing assert
module serve the two orthogonal purposes (provide
