Hi Bruno,
On 21 Oct 2011, at 06:58, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On the other hand, if by "incremental" you really mean chunking my rewrite
>> into
>> patches that add a function here and there, and disable bits of the old
>> script
>> when they are no longer called, then I co
On 10/20/2011 05:58 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On the other hand, if by "incremental" you really mean chunking my rewrite into
patches that add a function here and there, and disable bits of the old script
when they are no longer called, then I could be persuaded to do that.
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On the other hand, if by "incremental" you really mean chunking my rewrite
> into
> patches that add a function here and there, and disable bits of the old script
> when they are no longer called, then I could be persuaded to do that.
That would be a way to proceed. But i
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
...
> On the other hand, if by "incremental" you really mean chunking my rewrite
> into
> patches that add a function here and there, and disable bits of the old script
> when they are no longer called, then I could be persuaded to do that. How
> big should the chunks be to
Hi Jim,
On 20 Oct 2011, at 23:44, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On 19 Oct 2011, at 20:13, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Jim, please consider pulling it into coreutils master as a better fix than
> twidding Makefiles after the fact in bootstrap.conf.
>>>
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2011, at 20:13, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Jim, please consider pulling it into coreutils master as a better fix than
twidding Makefiles after the fact in bootstrap.conf.
> This -Iintl option will disappear with gettext versio
Ping?
On 16 Oct 2011, at 12:50, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 16 Oct 2011, at 04:15, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Is there anything else I can do to help you incorporate this, and the
>>> matching bootstrap.conf I wrote for you into coreutils now that the
>>> releas
Ping?
On 16 Oct 2011, at 18:28, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2011, at 15:58, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> If there is a bug in gnulib-tool, or autopoint that puts unnecessary
>>> 'intl/' references into Makefiles when the presence of
>>> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION in configu
Hi Jim,
On 19 Oct 2011, at 20:13, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Jim, please consider pulling it into coreutils master as a better fix than
>>> twidding Makefiles after the fact in bootstrap.conf.
>>>
This -Iintl option will disappear with gettext version 0.19 - because
>>>
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Jim, please consider pulling it into coreutils master as a better fix than
>> twidding Makefiles after the fact in bootstrap.conf.
>>
>>> This -Iintl option will disappear with gettext version 0.19 - because
>>> then "gettextize --intl" will not work any more; it's already
Ping?
On 16 Oct 2011, at 12:50, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 16 Oct 2011, at 04:15, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Is there anything else I can do to help you incorporate this, and the
>>> matching bootstrap.conf I wrote for you into coreutils now that the
>>> releas
Ping?
On 16 Oct 2011, at 18:28, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2011, at 15:58, Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> If there is a bug in gnulib-tool, or autopoint that puts unnecessary
>>> 'intl/' references into Makefiles when the presence of
>>> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION in configu
Hi Bruno,
On 16 Oct 2011, at 15:58, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> If there is a bug in gnulib-tool, or autopoint that puts unnecessary
>> 'intl/' references into Makefiles when the presence of
>> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION in configure.ac is a declaration that says there
>> is no nee
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> If there is a bug in gnulib-tool, or autopoint that puts unnecessary
> 'intl/' references into Makefiles when the presence of
> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION in configure.ac is a declaration that says there
> is no need for local 'intl/', then I think the bug should be fixed there
[[Bruno, I've kept you in for the gnulib-tool or autopoint bug I'm
intimating near the bottom of this message.]]
Hi Jim,
On 16 Oct 2011, at 04:15, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Is there anything else I can do to help you incorporate this, and the
>> matching bootstrap.conf I w
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Pádraig, Jim,
>
> Is there anything else I can do to help you incorporate this, and the
> matching bootstrap.conf I wrote for you into coreutils now that the
> release is out?
Hi Gary,
Thanks for persevering. I have just tried it.
It looks like your coreutils working
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for the advice, see below for the result.
Hi Pádraig, Jim,
Is there anything else I can do to help you incorporate this, and the
matching bootstrap.conf I wrote for you into coreutils now that the
release is out?
All,
Sorry for the late reply, thanks to unreasonably late raini
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > They're in different packages on my system:
> >
> > $ rpm -qf $(which autopoint)
> > gettext-devel-0.18.1.1-7.fc15.x86_64
> > $ rpm -qf $(which gettext)
> > gettext-0.18.1.1-7.fc15.x86_64
For 'bootstrap's purposes, the latter is irrelevant; only the presence
and version o
[[Cc: Bruno in the hope of advice on the right approach]]
Hi Pádraig,
On 6 Oct 2011, at 16:13, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 09:28 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> autopoint and gettext are synonymous, right? If not, only the gettext-0.18.1
>> check is made automatically, and I need to figu
Hi Jim,
On 6 Oct 2011, at 07:18, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Please find attached my updated bootstrap.conf to work with the coreutils
> master.
> I tested it alongside an upgraded bootstrap script from zile master:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/zile.git/plain/bootstrap
Note that I've fixe
On 10/06/2011 09:28 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Pádraig,
>
> On 6 Oct 2011, at 14:58, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> Thanks for the improvements.
>
> You're most welcome!
>
>> We're about to do a coreutils release, so I'm thinking
>> these changes might go in after that
>> so we can test thoroughly
Hi Pádraig,
On 6 Oct 2011, at 14:58, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Thanks for the improvements.
You're most welcome!
> We're about to do a coreutils release, so I'm thinking
> these changes might go in after that
> so we can test thoroughly.
Yes, that would be safest, I think. The coreutils bootstrap
Thanks for the improvements.
We're about to do a coreutils release, so I'm thinking
these changes might go in after that
so we can test thoroughly.
A few comments on the new bootstrap.conf
You seem to have synced against an old version of buildreq
which didn't have autotools or gettext listed.
Bu
Hi Jim,
On 5 Oct 2011, at 14:08, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 00:16, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> I haven't had time yet to pick up the coreutils bootstrap.conf update, but
>>> I'll probably be able to get to it by the end of the week. If you're in a
>>> hurry,
Hi Jim,
On 5 Oct 2011, at 00:16, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> On 4 Oct 2011, at 17:09, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Do you feel like rebasing it?
>>
>> Sure, although it will take me a few days to find the time - is that because
>> you're planning to adopt my bootstrap script into c
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 4 Oct 2011, at 17:09, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> Sorry I didn't notice your reply sooner.
>>>
>>> On 22 Sep 2011, at 23:38, Jim Meyering wrote:
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> * g...@github.com:gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils.git in gary/bo
Hi Jim,
On 4 Oct 2011, at 17:09, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Sorry I didn't notice your reply sooner.
>>
>> On 22 Sep 2011, at 23:38, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> * g...@github.com:gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils.git in gary/bootstrap
>> https://github.com
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Sorry I didn't notice your reply sooner.
>
> On 22 Sep 2011, at 23:38, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> * g...@github.com:gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils.git in gary/bootstrap
> https://github.com/gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils/commits/gary/bootstrap
>>
>> I'll try
Hi Jim,
Sorry I didn't notice your reply sooner.
On 22 Sep 2011, at 23:38, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
* g...@github.com:gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils.git in gary/bootstrap
https://github.com/gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils/commits/gary/bootstrap
>
> I'll try to find time for this n
On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> Hi Stefano!
>
Hi Gary, thanks for your quick and detailed answers.
> [[Items I agree with elided]]
>
Ditto.
> On 26 Sep 2011, at 17:27, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > Do you have a diff file to show what you've changed exactly? I'd find that
> > really
On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> >>
> > Maybe some code like this should be enough to catch most potential
> > erroneous definitions?
> >
> > case $po_download_command_format in
> >*[^%]%s*[^%]%s*) ;;
> >*) fatal "invalid format in \$po_download_command_format";;
> > esac
>
Hi Stefano,
On 26 Sep 2011, at 18:06, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
@cnindex gnulib_precious
@item gnulib_precious
Normally, @command{bootstrap} removes any macro-files that are not
included by @file{aclocal.m4} before it returns, except
Hi Stefano!
[[Items I agree with elided]]
On 26 Sep 2011, at 17:27, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
>> On 25 Sep 2011, at 22:55, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> On Thursday 22 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
Anyone:
It's beginning to look as though
On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> >> @cnindex gnulib_precious
> >> @item gnulib_precious
> >> Normally, @command{bootstrap} removes any macro-files that are not
> >> included by @file{aclocal.m4} before it returns, except for files
> >> listed in this variable which are always kept.
> >
Hi Stefano,
Thanks again for taking the time to review these files.
As before, I've accepted the changes into my copy wherever I haven't
commented otherwise below. Since there is no other natural home for
the texi file, since I wrote it specifically for gnulib, so I'm
attaching the latest versio
On Monday 26 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 25 Sep 2011, at 22:55, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> >> Anyone:
> >>
> >> It's beginning to look as though all this work is, once again, in very
> >> real danger of just slipping quietly
Hi Stefano,
On 25 Sep 2011, at 22:55, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Thursday 22 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
>> Anyone:
>>
>> It's beginning to look as though all this work is, once again, in very
>> real danger of just slipping quietly through the cracks.
>>
> Hi Gary. While I don't pretend t
And this is a quick review about the new documentation ...
On Thursday 22 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
>
> @node Bootstrap
> @chapter Bootstrap
>
> The process of executing the various tools required to bring all the
> generated files up to date in a directory freshly checked out from
> source c
On Thursday 22 September 2011, Gary V wrote:
> Anyone:
>
> It's beginning to look as though all this work is, once again, in very
> real danger of just slipping quietly through the cracks.
>
Hi Gary. While I don't pretend to really understand the scope and purposes
of your script, I might anyway
On 09/22/11 09:01, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> Perhaps you can refresh my
>> > memory about the diffutils issue?
> No issue that I'm aware of.
Ah, sorry, I must have confused diffutils with tar.
OK, I'll try to get to diffutils soon, with this.
Thanks for keeping us on our toes!
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> * g...@github.com:gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils.git in gary/bootstrap
>>> https://github.com/gvvaughan/GNU-coreutils/commits/gary/bootstrap
I'll try to find time for this next week.
I glanced through the first few lines of your script and found
FGREP=fgrep
EGREP=egrep
.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the quick response.
On 22 Sep 2011, at 22:40, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 09/22/11 05:42, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>> I'm treating the bootstrap script in GNU Zile git as the master copy
>
> It's certainly on my list of things to do.
> I was planning to do it with diffutils.
> But
On 09/22/11 05:42, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I'm treating the bootstrap script in GNU Zile git as the master copy
It's certainly on my list of things to do.
I was planning to do it with diffutils.
But if I recall, you said there was some minor
issue with diffutils and that dissuaded me from
just sw
43 matches
Mail list logo
