On 6 November 2013 14:51, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 07:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > Nothing so exciting I'm afraid, it's there to give 'git describe' a fair
> shot at working even in a shallow cloned gnulib subproject - otherwise
> certain invocations of bootstrap can break the relea
On 11/06/2013 07:48 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Nothing so exciting I'm afraid, it's there to give 'git describe' a fair shot
> at working even in a shallow cloned gnulib subproject - otherwise certain
> invocations of bootstrap can break the release rules in maint.mk.
>
> Jim plans to push a v
On 6 November 2013 14:48, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Hi Reuben,
>
> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> >
> > I'm intrigued by the version number tag 0.1 I get from a recent gnulib
> update, but poking around a) the repo, b) the mailing list archive, c) the
> sources and d) the we
Hi Reuben,
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>
> I'm intrigued by the version number tag 0.1 I get from a recent gnulib
> update, but poking around a) the repo, b) the mailing list archive, c) the
> sources and d) the web gives no clue as to its meaning or intended use.
> Apo
