Re: SEQ BUG

2007-06-09 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... >>> Another thing I just noticed. I would expect the precision >>> of all output in the following command to be to 2 decimal places not 1: >>> $ seq 0.00 0.01 0.90

Re: SEQ BUG

2007-06-09 Thread Paul Eggert
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> Another thing I just noticed. I would expect the precision >> of all output in the following command to be to 2 decimal places not 1: >> $ seq 0.00 0.01 0.90 | grep "\.[0-9]$" >> 0.1 >> 0.2 >> 0.3 >> 0.4 >

Re: SEQ BUG

2007-06-07 Thread Jim Meyering
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Another thing I just noticed. I would expect the precision > of all output in the following command to be to 2 decimal places not 1: > > $ seq 0.00 0.01 0.90 | grep "\.[0-9]$" > 0.1 > 0.2 > 0.3 > 0.4 > 0.5 > 0.6 > 0.7 > 0.8 > 0.9 Well, at least with t