Re: Possible bug in qcopy-acl.c

2023-09-01 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2023-09-01 11:47, Ondrej Valousek wrote: If it returns 1, then we probably don't care about few more syscalls because in most cases we copy files w/o acls. I think I'd care about unnecessary syscalls if I were using a filesystem with ACLs.

Re: Possible bug in qcopy-acl.c

2023-09-01 Thread Ondrej Valousek
care about few more syscalls because in most cases we copy files w/o acls. Ondrej Zasláno z Outlooku pro Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> From: Paul Eggert Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 8:20:12 PM To: Ondrej Valousek Cc: Gnulib bugs Subject: Re: Poss

Re: Possible bug in qcopy-acl.c

2023-09-01 Thread Paul Eggert
On 2023-09-01 04:24, Ondrej Valousek wrote: The disadvantage of it would be the additional call for file-has-acl() so hence few more kernel calls. Can the extra syscalls be avoided by migrating/copying some of file-has-acl.c's functionality into qcopy-acl.c? The idea would be to invoke listx