Re: NFS timestamps

2010-12-27 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/27/2010 06:20 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > If I remove the "&& !HAVE_WORKING_UTIMES" from the condition, the three > tests pass, except for a small part with symlinks that is skipped: Thanks for trying it out, and for going the extra mile and fixing that bug. I installed this: >From dd4243aa

Re: NFS timestamps

2010-12-27 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul, > I just now pushed the following to try to fix the main problem. > Can you please try this on your host? The same test failures persist: test-utimens.h:101: assertion failed FAIL: test-fdutimensat test-futimens.h:108: assertion failed FAIL: test-futimens test-utimens.h:101:

Re: NFS timestamps

2010-12-27 Thread Paul Eggert
On 12/26/2010 02:46 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: >>> . >> > With your patch, I still get "checking whether the utimes function works... > yes" > and the same failures: > test-futimens.h:108: assertion failed > FAIL: test-futimens

Re: NFS timestamps

2010-12-26 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Paul, > > - On the first machine type (x86 RHEL 3), I get the test failures > > related to NFS timestamps, mentioned in > > . > > I looked into that, and there are some obvious problems with the tests > in m4/utimes.