Re: EOVERFLOW

2008-03-30 Thread Bruno Haible
Jim Meyering wrote: > > Jim, is it ok to do the same for the 'getugroups' module? > > Sure. Applied: * lib/getugroups.c (EOVERFLOW): Remove fallback. * modules/getugroups (Depends-on): Add EOVERFLOW. *** lib/getugroups.c.orig 2008-03-30 15:55:05.0 +0200 --- lib/get

Re: EOVERFLOW

2008-03-30 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > I saw your new EOVERFLOW module - but you missed adding m4/eoverflow.m4. Huh? I don't understand what you mean. I tested the module on OSF/1 and mingw. What did I miss? Bruno

Re: EOVERFLOW

2008-03-30 Thread Jim Meyering
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> Hmm - should we provide a gnulib that guarantees all of the >> standard errors, rather than doing an ad-hoc definition of EOVERFLOW and >> others in every place where they are used? > > We already have an EOVERFLOW replacement macro i

Re: EOVERFLOW

2008-03-30 Thread Bruno Haible
Eric Blake wrote: > Hmm - should we provide a gnulib that guarantees all of the > standard errors, rather than doing an ad-hoc definition of EOVERFLOW and > others in every place where they are used? We already have an EOVERFLOW replacement macro in m4/eoverflow.m4. It would be better to use it r