Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I omitted stdbool on the theory that packages that to assume C99 don't
> need to use the stdbool module, since stdbool.h comes with C99.
For what it's worth, this wasn't a package assuming c99. I think it
was a result of including something that autoscan
Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dirname.h includes stdbool.h but the dirname module is missing a
> Depends-on for it.
I omitted stdbool on the theory that packages that to assume C99 don't
need to use the stdbool module, since stdbool.h comes with C99.
However, this subject seems to reco
