Hi Jim,
> I think it is uncontroversial.
>
> Pushed. I hope that's ok.
The time window you gave me to react on this one was less than 24 hours;
I couldn't answer in time.
On this one, I would have preferred to silence the warnings in a cheaper
way. It's irrelevant for the train of events insid
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Is this ok with you?
Since this is merely making test-select-stdin.c
consistent with its much-larger parent, test-select.c,
and doesn't even require an added dependency or
File:/macros.h listing, I think it is uncontroversial.
Pushed. I hope that's ok.
> With
