a licensing violation by linking to both libreadline (GPLv3+)
and a libvirt.so containing virtualbox code (LGPLv2-only) at the same
time (those two licenses are incompatible).
For the record ... as far as I know, LGPLv2, both -only and -later, is
compatible with GPLv-anything (in
onsdag den 16 oktober 2013 klockan 15:26 skrev Eric Blake detta:
> On 10/16/2013 02:08 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> > Isn???t libedit supposed to be a clone of Readline just for the sake of
> > avoiding the GPL?
> >
> > Why not let its maintainers fix it, if they really want it to behave
> >
Mats Erik Andersson skribis:
> I can add, that in the GNU Inetutils project, the module "readline"
> is useless precisely of the above reason.
Given that Inetutils is unlikely to be used on non-GNU systems, what
about supporting just Readline?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Eric Blake skribis:
> On 10/16/2013 02:08 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Mats Erik Andersson skribis:
>>
>>> I would like to see the module readline to access also libedit,
>>> should libreadline be missing on a particular system. The patch
>>> contained here successfully links against libedit o
onsdag den 16 oktober 2013 klockan 22:08 skrev Ludovic Courtès detta:
> Mats Erik Andersson skribis:
>
> > I would like to see the module readline to access also libedit,
> > should libreadline be missing on a particular system. The patch
> > contained here successfully links against libedit on N
On 10/16/2013 02:08 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Mats Erik Andersson skribis:
>
>> I would like to see the module readline to access also libedit,
>> should libreadline be missing on a particular system. The patch
>> contained here successfully links against libedit on NetBSD and
>> Debian GNU/kF
Mats Erik Andersson skribis:
> I would like to see the module readline to access also libedit,
> should libreadline be missing on a particular system. The patch
> contained here successfully links against libedit on NetBSD and
> Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. Likewise, it still behaves correctly with
> lib
