Re: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL

2012-06-10 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/10/12 16:19, Bruno Haible wrote: Hi Bruce, Paul, Jim, Bruno, and Ralf as the set of all contributors besides yourself (although some of those contributions were trivial) before making this change. They were all trivial, actually. Well, I think 3-line comments as in the 2008-12-17 chan

Re: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL

2012-06-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Bruce, > > Paul, Jim, Bruno, and Ralf as the set of all contributors > > besides yourself (although some of those contributions were trivial) > > before making this change. > > They were all trivial, actually. Well, I think 3-line comments as in the 2008-12-17 change [1] are copyrightable, be

Re: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL

2012-06-08 Thread Bruce Korb
On 06/08/12 13:38, Eric Blake wrote: modules/parse-duration |2 +- This hunk is sufficient, but only if we either have agreement from all non-trivial contributors on making the change to the license, or permission from the FSF. Based on 'git log', it looks like you need consent from Paul,

Re: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL

2012-06-08 Thread Paul Eggert
On 06/08/2012 01:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > ased on 'git log', it looks like you need > consent from Paul, My contributions were trivial but for what it's worth it's OK with me to relicense this under the LGPL.

Re: [PATCH] parse-duration: Lessen the GPL

2012-06-08 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/08/2012 02:20 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > This gets included by NTP and they need a more liberal license: > > lib/parse-duration.c | 14 +++--- > lib/parse-duration.h |8 These hunks are not needed. We prefer to leave 'lib' at the latest license, and it is your use