On 09/02/2014 05:17 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
On 09/02/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Looking at wget(1), I'm a little surprised that the selected options
appear to avoid clobbering files whose names conflict. I would have
expected
On 09/02/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Looking at wget(1), I'm a little surprised that the selected options
appear to avoid clobbering files whose names conflict. I would have
expected that we'd want to overwrite them, to get the fresher version.
But the existing wget invocation does the same
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:15:16PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >Looking at wget(1), I'm a little surprised that the selected options
> >appear to avoid clobbering files whose names conflict. I would have
> >expected that we'd want to overwrite them,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 12:22:54PM +0200, Mathieu Anquetin wrote:
> Current implementation only tries to rsync PO files when rsync is
> installed on the host. In case of error, no files are downloaded even
> if they are available. This leads to bootstrap problems for hosts
> that lie behind a restr