On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:20:06 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I'd rather not, as the idea is not gnulib-specific.
Thanks, I understood.
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
how about "gl_assert" instead of "assure"?
I'd rather not, as the idea is not gnulib-specific.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:03:23 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> That sort of thing looks like it'd be reasonably annoying in the long
> run. How about the attached patch instead?
I confirmed that it had already been committed.
Thanks.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:03:23 -0800
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
> > +#if NDEBUG
> > + close (cdb->fd);
> > +#else
> > bool close_fail = close (cdb->fd);
> > assert (! close_fail);
> > +#endif
>
> That sort of thing looks like it'd be reasonably annoying in the
Norihiro Tanaka wrote:
+#if NDEBUG
+ close (cdb->fd);
+#else
bool close_fail = close (cdb->fd);
assert (! close_fail);
+#endif
That sort of thing looks like it'd be reasonably annoying in the long run. How
about the attached patch instead?
>From 972fd2a46979d17458eb900235
