Paul Eggert wrote in ChangeLog entry:
> Is Plan 9 still a valid porting target, anyway?
Well, it got requested in 2012 [1]. And, I guess, it has some educational value
regarding Unix and minimalism.
Bruno
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-02/msg4.html
Jens Staal wrote:
> I think the problem basically is that I do not fully understand what is
> done in all those other OSes defined in fpurge.c and what is expected
> from this function
Yes, it's not easy to understand the various stdioext operations.
Here is a tentative
On 02/03/2012 07:25 AM, Jens Staal wrote:
>> I suggest getting a copy of the Plan 9 source code,
>> and looking at how getchar and putchar work.
> from stdio.h:
Sorry, I meant the source code, as in stdio.c
(or putchar.c, or whatever). That is, you can't merely
look at the headers -- you need to
Plan9 as a hobby project [1] and ran into
this issue when trying to port GNU m4 and I am sort of lost...
[1] http://code.google.com/p/ports2plan9/
On 02/02/2012 08:14 PM, Jens Staal wrote:
> So I should use *rp and *wp
> - but how?
I suggest getting a copy of the Plan 9 source code,
and looking at how getchar and putchar work.
2012/2/2 Paul Eggert :
> On 02/02/2012 03:04 AM, Jens Staal wrote:
>> do I need a custom made one
>> and how should that one look?
>
> That's what it looks like. You can start by inspecting
> and look for fields in its FILE * structure.
The Plan9 APE stdio can be
On 02/02/2012 03:04 AM, Jens Staal wrote:
> do I need a custom made one
> and how should that one look?
That's what it looks like. You can start by inspecting
and look for fields in its FILE * structure.
